Create an evidence-based argument for the guilt or innocence of Lizzie Borden. Who do you believe was responsible for the murders? What specific evidence supports your claim? (at least 3 pieces of specific evidence) Why does that evidence make your explanation more convincing than the alternatives? Speculation: if we could go back in time with the technology we have to today and investigate the crime, what evidence might we be able to find that could prove your theory? Identify at least one piece of evidence that could be used against your theory, and explain why you believe your argument is still stronger. Example: Someone could argue that Lizzie could not have committed the murders because __________. However, __________ makes this explanation less convincing because __________.