tạo slide dựa theo nội dung sau, bằng tiếng anh, thêm hình ảnh sinh động: Topic: Should Universities Replace Final Exams with Continuous Assessment? Tớ làm theo hướng đồng ý thay thế kỳ thi cuối kỳ bằng đánh giá liên tục, với 2 lý do chính, 1 counterargument, phản hồi, và bằng chứng nghiên cứu. Câu tiếng Anh đơn giản, tự nhiên, dễ học thuộc và thuyết trình. Part 1. Slide Content Slide 1 Should Universities Replace Final Exams with Continuous Assessment? Our Position: Agree Critical Thinking Presentation Slide 2 Our Position We believe that universities should replace final exams with continuous assessment. Students can learn more regularly. Students can receive feedback during the course. Assessment can measure learning over time. Slide 3 Reason 1: Better Learning Habits Continuous assessment encourages students to study regularly. Students do not need to study everything at the last minute. Regular practice can help students understand and remember lessons. Evidence: A 2015 randomized study of 78 medical students found that students with cumulative assessments spent more time on self-study than students assessed only at the end of the course. Wiley Online Library +1 Slide 4 Reason 2: More Feedback and Better Performance Students can see their mistakes during the course. Teachers can give feedback before the course ends. Students have more chances to improve their work. Evidence: A study published in the European Journal of Engineering Education examined a large undergraduate engineering course. The researchers reported improved student performance after replacing a final exam with weekly homework. Taylor & Francis Online +1 Slide 5 Counterargument Some people believe that continuous assessment can increase students' workload. Students may have assignments every week. Multiple deadlines can cause stress. Different teachers may use different assessment methods. Slide 6 Our Response We agree that continuous assessment can create extra pressure. However, universities can reduce this problem by planning deadlines carefully. Teachers can use different types of assessment, such as projects, presentations, and short quizzes. With good planning, students can receive regular feedback without having too much work at one time. Slide 7 Credible Evidence Research shows both benefits and limitations. Paloposki, Virtanen, and Clavert (2025): Weekly homework was associated with improved performance in a large engineering course. Kerdijk et al. (2015): Cumulative assessment increased self-study time, but the study did not find a short-term improvement in overall knowledge. Our point: Continuous assessment has potential, but its design matters. Aalto University's research portal +1 Slide 8 Conclusion Universities should replace final exams with continuous assessment because: It encourages regular learning. It gives students opportunities to receive feedback and improve. It can support better learning experiences when well designed. Thank you for listening!
tạo slide dựa theo nội dung sau, bằng tiếng anh, thêm hình ảnh sinh động: Topic: Should Universities Replace Final Exams with Continuous Assessment? Tớ làm theo hướng đồng ý thay thế kỳ thi cuối kỳ bằng đánh giá liên tục, với 2 lý do chính, 1 counterargument, phản hồi, và bằng chứng nghiên cứu. Câu tiếng Anh đơn giản, tự nhiên, dễ học thuộc và thuyết trình. Part 1. Slide Content Slide 1 Should Universities Replace Final Exams with Continuous Assessment? Our Position: Agree Critical Thinking Presentation Slide 2 Our Position We believe that universities should replace final exams with continuous assessment. Students can learn more regularly. Students can receive feedback during the course. Assessment can measure learning over time. Slide 3 Reason 1: Better Learning Habits Continuous assessment encourages students to study regularly. Students do not need to study everything at the last minute. Regular practice can help students understand and remember lessons. Evidence: A 2015 randomized study of 78 medical students found that students with cumulative assessments spent more time on self-study than students assessed only at the end of the course. Wiley Online Library +1 Slide 4 Reason 2: More Feedback and Better Performance Students can see their mistakes during the course. Teachers can give feedback before the course ends. Students have more chances to improve their work. Evidence: A study published in the European Journal of Engineering Education examined a large undergraduate engineering course. The researchers reported improved student performance after replacing a final exam with weekly homework. Taylor & Francis Online +1 Slide 5 Counterargument Some people believe that continuous assessment can increase students' workload. Students may have assignments every week. Multiple deadlines can cause stress. Different teachers may use different assessment methods. Slide 6 Our Response We agree that continuous assessment can create extra pressure. However, universities can reduce this problem by planning deadlines carefully. Teachers can use different types of assessment, such as projects, presentations, and short quizzes. With good planning, students can receive regular feedback without having too much work at one time. Slide 7 Credible Evidence Research shows both benefits and limitations. Paloposki, Virtanen, and Clavert (2025): Weekly homework was associated with improved performance in a large engineering course. Kerdijk et al. (2015): Cumulative assessment increased self-study time, but the study did not find a short-term improvement in overall knowledge. Our point: Continuous assessment has potential, but its design matters. Aalto University's research portal +1 Slide 8 Conclusion Universities should replace final exams with continuous assessment because: It encourages regular learning. It gives students opportunities to receive feedback and improve. It can support better learning experiences when well designed. Thank you for listening!
Created using ChatSlide
This proposal advocates for continuous assessment over traditional finals, emphasizing the development of regular study habits through ongoing evaluations. Evidence from a randomized medical study supports this shift. Weekly feedback is shown to enhance student performance, particularly in engineering, though concerns about workload and stress are acknowledged. Effective assessment design is crucial, with varied formats and well-planned deadlines leading to improved learning outcomes. The...